Question

2. Jane Jackson purchased a sealed can of Katydids, chocolate-covered pecan caramel candies manufactured by Nestle. Shortly after, Jackson bit into one of the candies and allegedly broke a tooth on a pecan shell embedded in the candy. She filed a complaint, asserting breach of implied warranty. How would you argue on behalf of the company?

Answer 1

The argument for the company would be based on the fact that, she could have had a defective tooth which only broke while eating the Katydids candies. Most times, the warranty offered in food is with regards to the food being expired, unwholesome for eating due to foreign materials inside etc.

Her filing for breach of warranty over her defective tooth is uncalled for.

Step-by-step explanation: