276,913 views
23 votes
23 votes
Help me please!!

Topic
Who Thought This?
Lamarck, Darwin,
or both?
1. Organisms have change over time.
2.
Organisms changed because they wanted to survive.
3.
There was variation in a population.
4.
Certain traits helped organisms survive and reproduce
Better than other organisms without those traits.
5. Organisms can never become extinct.
6. The environment had something to do with why
organisms changed.
7. Parents are able to pass on at least some of their traits
to their offspring.
8. Parents are only able to pass on traits that they were
born with.
9. Organisms could decide to change something about their
body and pass on that change to their offspring.
10. Organisms are still changing.

Help me please!! Topic Who Thought This? Lamarck, Darwin, or both? 1. Organisms have-example-1
User Platte Gruber
by
3.3k points

1 Answer

9 votes
9 votes

Answer:

1. Both

2. Lamarck
3. Darwin
4. Darwin
5. Lamarck
6. Both
7. Both
8. Darwin
9. Lamarck
10. Both

Step-by-step explanation:

in 1, we need time therefore both. In 2, Lamarck because in Darwinian evolution, species change not organisms. In 3, Darwin because of natural selection, mutation, and probably a little bit of heredity. 4 is Darwin because in Lamarckian evolution. 5 is Lamarck because based on natural selection, organisms should go extinct. 6 is both because they both rely on the environment. 7 is both because of heredity. 8 is Darwin because in Lamarckian evolution, traits acquired throughout ones lifetime can be passed down to offspring. 9 is Lamarck because in Darwinian evolution, organisms do not decide their traits. 10 is both because both idea ssupport the idea that organisms, be it in Lamarckian or Darwinian evolution, are still and will carry out on changing.

User John Sansom
by
3.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.