Question

Purpose

After engaging in a debate, evaluate your participation as a listener and speaker through a written
response
Summary
In this assignment, you will work with your class, a partner, or a teacher to determine a topic for debate,
You will choose roles, prepare for the debate, and conduct a debate,
Debate Resolution
Choose a debate topic that is important to your community. The topic should be presented in the form of
a resolution. For example, you might choose to debate the following resolution: "School uniforms should
be required for all students. In each debate, one side will argue in favor of the resolution, and the other
side will argue against the resolution.​

Answer 1

College debates and argumentative writing assignments require selecting a controversial issue, researching it, presenting a clear argument, and understanding multiple perspectives to develop a nuanced stance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Debates and argumentative writing assignments are integral parts of college education that develop critical thinking and persuasive skills. These tasks often involve taking a stance on a controversial issue and constructing a coherent position argument. The process begins with choosing a topic relevant to your interests or community, conducting thorough research, and formulating a clear viewpoint. It is essential to present this viewpoint persuasively, supported by reasoning and evidence, and to consider opposing perspectives with empathy.

For an effective debate, partners work on opposing views and use researched evidence to enrich their oral presentations, which could include additional media like PowerPoint, visuals, or sound. The argument should be presented clearly, allowing the audience to understand your position without guessing.

A key aspect of these assignments is to both understand and challenge multiple perspectives on an issue, ultimately developing and expressing a nuanced interpretation of the subject matter. Activities such as reading and responding to texts, sharing analyses, and revising arguments based on peer feedback are valuable experiences that enhance learning.

Answer 2

This might work

Step-by-step explanation:

Vaping is not good for the human body

I said that vaping is not good because it puts bad stuff in your lungs like nickel and lead. I could prove this because it was on a spotify ad.

I learned that when you vape, it's like spraying hair spray in your lungs. And it also went with my thing about toxic metals.

Jeff sat next to Bob and Jeff said that vaping is like inhaling all the good vitamins for the day. Bob then said no, it isn't like that.

I then said that vaping could give you vitamins, but maybe not the good ones that you don't want in your body.

Bob also had seen the spotify ad about vaping and he looked up that it was not an actual vape monster in it and that it was just there to represent that vaping is like a silent and small monster that is not good for you.

Jeff said that the monster was real, but he didn't have any evidence to prove it was real, but Bob did.

All the evidence that Bob had made it really easy to know which is a better thing to do, which was to vape, or not to vape.

I made sure the language was appropriate by looking at it and making sure everything was spelled correctly and the correct grammar was used. I used formal language.