Question

Explain in one or two sentences how the following statement could be unwarranted implication. No other vitamin or preventive measure against illness is better than vitamin C.

Answer 1

The claim that vitamin C is superior to all other vitamins and preventive measures is an unwarranted implication because it overlooks the complexities of nutritional science and disease prevention.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement "No other vitamin or preventive measure against illness is better than vitamin C" could be an unwarranted implication because it dismisses the efficacy and importance of other vitamins and preventive health measures. Vitamins C and E function as antioxidants and are essential for preventing damage from free radicals. However, implying that vitamin C is superior without sufficient evidence oversimplifies the complex role various nutrients and lifestyle factors play in disease prevention. Moreover, although vitamin C is associated with the prevention of scurvy and may assist in immune function, comprehensive health approaches consider the synergistic effects of multiple vitamins and health practices.

Answer 2

The statement is an unjustified implication because it implies that no other vitamins are important and that no preventive measures are effective if they lack vitamin C.

Step-by-step explanation:

An unjustified implication is a statement that leaves messages implicit and implied. This type of statement ends up passing messages in indirect and subjunctive ways, related to the main message being spoken.

In the statement shown in the question above, the speaker places supreme importance on vitamin C, implying that other types of vitamins and preventive measures are inefficient.