41.9k views
1 vote
Which of the following is true regarding the effect of a debtor offering to pay a different type of payment, for example, goods instead of money, on a debt for which there is not a dispute over the amount or existence of the debt, and the creditor agrees?

A. A liquidated debt is involved, and there is an accord and satisfaction.
B. A liquidated debt is involved, and there is an accord but no satisfaction.
C. A liquidated debt is involved, and there is not a satisfaction or an accord.
D. An un-liquidated debt is involved, and there is an accord and satisfaction.
E. An un-liquidated debt is involved, and there is an accord but not satisfaction.

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

D. An un-liquidated debt is involved, and there is an accord and satisfaction.

Step-by-step explanation:

The impact when debtor offers to pay the different type of payment like goods instead of money, non dispute debt arises when the unliquidated debt is involved that means the amount is owed as mentioned in the contract or it is under dispute

Plus it also accord and satisfaction

Therefore the correct option is d.

User Evyatar
by
4.7k points