Answer:
We failed to reject H₀
t < 2.06
1.5 < 2.06
We do not have significant evidence at significance level α=0.05 to show that the mean G.P.A. of CC students transferring to Sac State is above 3.3
Explanation:
Set up hypotheses:
Null hypotheses = H₀: μ = 3.3
Alternate hypotheses = H₁: μ > 3.3
Determine type of test:
Since the alternate hypothesis states that mean G.P.A. of CC students transferring to Sac State is above 3.3, therefore we will use a upper-tailed test.
Select the test statistic:
Since the sample size is very small (n < 30) therefore, we will use t-distribution.
Determine level of significance and critical value:
Given level of significance = 5% = 0.05
Since it is a upper tailed test,
At α = 0.05 and DF = n – 1 = 25 - 1 = 24
t-score = 2.06
Set up decision rule:
Since it is a upper tailed test, using a t statistic at a significance level of 5%
We Reject H₀ if t > 2.06
Compute the test statistic:
![$ t = \frac{\bar{x}-\mu}{(s)/(√(n) ) } $](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/52njp8h8anbank14mlfap3c2iz4gxwji2a.png)
![$ t = ( 3.45- 3.3 )/((0.5)/(√(25) ) ) $](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/la060875atyyv1qgh5q59ug2p18x1996j4.png)
![t = 1.5](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/9blv7p13oght4nqgmffgop8i7fwlxb6k88.png)
Conclusion:
We failed to reject H₀
t < 2.06
1.5 < 2.06
We do not have significant evidence at significance level α=0.05 to show that the mean G.P.A. of CC students transferring to Sac State is above 3.3