Answer:
a) Alternative hypothesis: the use of the coupons is isgnificantly higher than 10%.
Null hypothesis: the use of the coupons is not significantly higher than 10%.
The null and alternative hypothesis can be written as:
![H_0: \pi=0.1\\\\H_a:\pi>0.1](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/2sesl7crsfg9i6ezvv6rmwvnxhcymdoltv.png)
b) Point estimate p=0.13
c) At a significance level of 0.05, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of coupons use is significantly higher than 10%.
Eagle should not go national with the promotion as there is no evidence it has been succesful.
Explanation:
The question is incomplete.
The sample data shows that x=13 out of n=100 use the coupons.
This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.
The claim is that the proportion of coupons use is significantly higher than 10%.
Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:
![H_0: \pi=0.1\\\\H_a:\pi>0.1](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/2sesl7crsfg9i6ezvv6rmwvnxhcymdoltv.png)
The significance level is 0.05.
The sample has a size n=100.
The point estimate for the population proportion is the sample proportion and has a value of p=0.13.
![p=X/n=13/100=0.13](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/l0r46lq618ky4lx3qyrfawxv42qda9hxpd.png)
The standard error of the proportion is:
![\sigma_p=\sqrt{(\pi(1-\pi))/(n)}=\sqrt{(0.1*0.9)/(100)}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=√(0.0009)=0.03](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/28y5v14zkqn0p56fcqycej7qhugorxa1o9.png)
Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:
![z=(p-\pi-0.5/n)/(\sigma_p)=(0.13-0.1-0.5/100)/(0.03)=(0.025)/(0.03)=0.833](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/163cvcipas7jompii4e5xk6iok2wwmq618.png)
This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:
As the P-value (0.202) is greater than the significance level (0.05), the effect is not significant.
The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.
At a significance level of 0.05, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of coupons use is significantly higher than 10%.