44.6k views
1 vote
, do the Bill of Rights still have merit or if not, what would you change in order to improve upon what the Founders intended? Explain your position…

User Tckmn
by
3.7k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Final answer:

The Bill of Rights still has merit in today's society but could be improved upon in certain areas. The Second Amendment needs to be balanced with public safety, and digital privacy rights should be explicitly protected in the Fifth Amendment.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Bill of Rights still has merit in today's society. The protections outlined in the Bill of Rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and assembly, are fundamental to a democratic society and should continue to be upheld. However, there are some areas that could be improved upon to better align with the intentions of the Founders.

One area that could be improved is the interpretation of the Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms. The Founders intended for this right to be balanced with the need for public safety. Today, there is a need for stricter regulations and background checks to ensure responsible gun ownership.

Additionally, the Fifth Amendment could be updated to include protections against new forms of government surveillance and digital privacy invasion. With advancements in technology, there is a need to explicitly protect individuals' privacy rights in the digital age.

User Martin Nycander
by
4.0k points
1 vote

Answer:

Yes, the Bill of Rights still holds an important position in the Consitution of the United States.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Bill of Rights is the term given to the first ten Constitutional amendments in the United States. Any modification to an amendment is a further amendment by description. It was meant to back up people's belief that powers not vested in the United States were retained for the people of the state. This amendment is critical as it ensures states retain control, sovereignty, independence, and freedom. Founding fathers of the American Consitution thought it thoroughly that individual rights of citizens should not be comprised by the powerful government and therefore I refrain to change anything in it.

User Markus Persson
by
3.7k points