Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Frauds that are perpetrated with multiple parties in different positions of control make detecting fraud more difficult. True
Fraudsters know that the more people and locations are engaged in their schemes, the longer is to track who was part of it.
So many people recruited by the employees' friends that made it longer it gets to catch them.
b. Claims should be authorized and verified before payment is made. True
In this case, the verifying system couldn't handle this because the 'cashier' (employee's friend) was part of the scheme and the one who authorized some payments. Other payments were authorized because through this scheme it was legit.
c. The employee made sure each claim had a phony "victim." True
When He wrote these settlement checks the recipients were the phony victims recruited to act like real ones.
d. Corrupt lawyers were brought into the fraud to act as attorneys for the claimants. True
Yes, these lawyers were paid to be the defendants of the phony victims, who claimed in the Court. They helped in the Court to give it a color of the truth.