Question

True or false. If Americans decided to eat more chicken and less beef, the future size of the chicken population would increase and the cattle population decline. True False True or false. Resources that are commonly owned are likely to be over-utilized and poorly maintained. True False True or false: Ocean fisheries are generally owned in common; as a result, the quantity of various species such as salmon are often overfished.

Answer 1

If Americans choose to eat more chicken and less beef, it is likely that the future size of the chicken population will increase, while the cattle population will decline.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement is true. If Americans decided to eat more chicken and less beef, the future size of the chicken population would increase and the cattle population would likely decline. This is because there would be a higher demand for chicken, leading to an increase in chicken production, while the demand for beef would decrease, leading to a decrease in cattle production. This could be influenced by various factors such as consumer preferences, health concerns, and environmental concerns.

One example of this can be seen in the shift towards plant-based alternatives to meat, such as soy-based products and lab-grown meat, which is driven by concerns about environmental sustainability and animal welfare. As more people choose these alternatives, the demand for traditional meat products like beef could decline, leading to a decrease in the cattle population.

In summary, if Americans choose to eat more chicken and less beef, the future size of the chicken population will likely increase, while the cattle population will decline.

Answer 2

The given first statement is true, that is, with the increase in the demand for chicken, the chicken market will rise, and in the same way with the decline in the demand for beef, the production of cattle will decrease based on the law of demand.

The given second statement is also true, as the resources mentioned in the given statement is a tragedy of commons as the common access resources are rivalrous and non-excludable.

The given third statement is also true, as the mentioned ocean fisheries is a tragedy of commons as the common access resources are rivalrous and non-excludable.