Final answer:
The title 'Memories of a Memory' suggests that our memories are not as real or factual as we think they are because they can be vague, filled with general knowledge, and change over time. This makes eyewitness testimony unreliable as evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The title 'Memories of a Memory' suggests that our memories are not as real or factual as we think they are. Human memories are a mixture of non-factual things and can be vague, filled in with general knowledge, and can change over time. These factors contribute to the unreliability of eyewitness testimony as evidence in scientific inquiries and trials.
In the article, it states that 'memory is vague' and tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen rather than specific details. This supports the idea that memories are not as real or factual as we think they are.
Furthermore, the article mentions that memory uses general knowledge to fill in gaps and that the more a witness's account is told, the less accurate it becomes. This indicates that memories are not always based in fact and can be influenced and altered over time.