Answer:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fc54/0fc54340b262537c2d5d43a134a34e3d08a08e48" alt="\displaystyle \lim_(x \to 2) (x)/(f(x)+1) = +\infty"
Explanation:
From the graph, we can see that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3573/e35735de8b372b68b82f4cebd5da1e4f3f61c6ed" alt="\displaystyle \lim_(x \to 2) f(x)= -1"
From direct substitution, we have that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0f54/c0f549aecaab972688945993ac3783d332e0ea87" alt="\displaystyle \lim_(x \to 2) (x)/(f(x)+1)\Rightarrow ((2))/(-1+1)"
Evaluate:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03816/0381639fdb6e00451fbeab388908dbbc52c61c53" alt="\displaystyle = (2)/(0)=\text{Und.}"
Saying undefined (or unbounded) would be correct.
However, note that as x approaches two, the value of y decreases in order to get to negative one. In other words, our function f will always be greater or equal to negative one (you can also see this from the graph). This means that as x approaches two, f(x) will approach -0.99, -0.999 and -0.9999 and so on until it reaches negative one and then go back up. Importantly, because of this, we can state that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1755d/1755d916d93753ba576915e49d24eec8ccd6dfc7" alt="\displaystyle \lim_(x \to 2) (x)/(f(x)+1)=((2))/(-1+1) = +\infty"
This is because for the denominator, the +1 will always be greater than the f(x). This makes this increase towards positive infinity. Note that limits want the values of the function as it approaches it, not at it.