Answer:
SAMPLE RESPONSE :No. Mike wrote the ratio as the amount of change to the new amount. He should have used the ratio of the amount of change to the original amount, which is 55
275
, or 20%.
Explanation:
No. Mike wrote the ratio as the amount of change to the new amount. He should have used the ratio of the amount of change to the original amount, which is 55
55/275 , or 20%.
took the test on edg <3
4.5m questions
5.7m answers