Final answer:
Daniel's survey is not likely to be considered valid because it includes biased information that may influence the respondents, leading to a biased sample rather than an objective representation of the student body's opinion.
Step-by-step explanation:
Daniel's survey regarding the local math requirement may not be considered valid because of several potential biases. By including information that supports his own view, Daniel may inadvertently sway participants' opinions, thereby violating the impartiality needed for a legitimate survey. Without ensuring different perspectives or a neutral stance, the survey results might reflect a biased sample, not a true representation of the student body's opinion on the math requirement. Furthermore, while Daniel did distribute surveys to every student, which is a good practice for sample representativeness, the added information that is biased towards his viewpoint potentially compromises the survey's objectivity.
When conducting research, it's critical to avoid coercion and bias to attain a volunteer sample reflective of the entire population. Any form of incentive or manipulation could skew results. Additionally, accurate representation in survey data is essential for making a strong case in front of a board of education or any other decision-making body, as seen in exercises demonstrating the importance of a representative sample for academic integrity.