130k views
1 vote
What were some provisions of the Dred Scott case? Select three responses

No black person, free or enslaved, could be a US citizen
All black people were subject to becoming enalaved,
There could be no legal ban on slavery in the territoriea.
The territories could retain their popular sovereignty
The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional

User Ameya Rote
by
5.2k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer:

1,3,5

Explanation:

User Keul
by
5.2k points
4 votes

Answer:

Following were the provisions of Dred Scott case:

  1. No black person, free or enslaved, could be a US citizen.
  2. There could be no legal ban on slavery on the territories.
  3. The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.

Explanation:

Dred scott was the slave of an army surgeon. He accompanied his owner to Illinois, which had become a free state at that time. However, he later returned back to Missouri, which was a slave state. In 1846, Dred Scott sued for their freedom in a St. Louis court. According to him, as he had been living in a free state for some time, he should be freed from the slavery.

After 11 years, Dred Scott's case eventually reached the US Supreme court, which ruled against him.

User Patrick Simard
by
5.2k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.