Final answer:
Using a one-sample Z-test, the test statistic was calculated as 3.0833, which corresponds to a p-value much less than 0.01, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis at α = 0.05. The critical value approach also supports rejecting the null hypothesis as the test statistic exceeds the Z-critical value of 1.645.
Step-by-step explanation:
To address the student's question regarding hypothesis testing for the average hours adults spend on chores during a weekend, we must first define the null and alternative hypotheses and then calculate the test statistic. Afterward, we find the p-value and make a decision based on the significance level, α = 0.05. The null hypothesis (H0) is that adults spend an average of 14 hours on chores (μ = 14), while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that they spend more than 14 hours on chores (μ > 14).
Given the information:
- Sample mean (μ) = 14.65 hours
- Population standard deviation (σ) = 3.0 hours
- Sample size (n) = 200
We use a one-sample Z-test to calculate the test statistic:
Z = (X - μ) / (σ / √n) = (14.65 - 14) / (3 / √200) = 3.0833
Using the Z-table, find the p-value corresponding to the Z-score of 3.0833. The p-value is very small (much less than 0.01), indicating strong evidence against the null hypothesis. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis at α = 0.05 since the p-value is less than 0.05.
For part b), the critical value approach, we find the critical Z-value for a one-tailed test at α = 0.05, which is approximately 1.645. Since our test statistic of 3.0833 is greater than the critical value of 1.645, we again reject the null hypothesis.
In conclusion, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that adults spend more than 14 hours on chores during a weekend.