Answer:
Option A
Step-by-step explanation:
Unlike the Ohio State studies, the University of Michigan studies on leadership placed the defined dimensions of leadership behavior on opposite ends of a single continuum. The Ohio State University studies approach places two leadership behaviors at opposite ends of the same continuum, making it one-dimensional with two styles. The University of Michigan model considers the two behaviors independent of one another, making it two-dimensional with four styles.
The goal of the Michigan leadership studies was to determine the pattern of leadership behaviors that results in effective group performance.One of it conclusion was that a leader who focuses on work procedures and performance is exhibiting job-centered leader behavior. While,The Ohio State studies is associated with the behavioral approach to leadership.One of it conclusion was that a leader who focuses on subordinates' feelings and ideas is exhibiting consideration behavior.