Answer: 1. a. The existence of a no-fault law.
2. d. $17,000
Step-by-step explanation:
1. For Jane to prove that Famous was indeed negligent, she definitely does not need the No - Fault law. This is a law that is mostly applicable to motor vehicle accidents and means that the individual parties are responsible for whatever injuries they sustain and the person who actually caused the accident is irrelevant. The main aim of this is to reduce the damages claims that one can be put on Insurance which increase insurance premiums.
If this law was to be applied here, Jane would be responsible for her own injuries and her suit would fail.
2. Jane missed 2 weeks of work and in each week she earns $5,000.
She also had medical expenses of $4,000 and estimated pain and suffering of $3,000.
The general damages therefore are the two weeks she missed plus the medical expenses and the pain and suffering.
= 5,000 ( 2) + 4,000 + 3,000
= 10,000 + 7,000
= $17,000