Final answer:
Comparing oral and written readings of T.S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" reveals that an oral interpretation offers rhythm and emotional expression, while a written reading allows for personal and reflective interaction with the text.
Step-by-step explanation:
When comparing the oral and written readings of T.S. Eliot's poem "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock," preference may vary between individuals. An oral reading might capture the rhythm, tone, and emotional nuances in a way that resonates more deeply with listeners. The cadence and emphasis placed on certain words can bring the poem to life, offering an interpretation that is enriched by the speaker's voice and inflections. On the other hand, a written reading allows for a more personal and introspective experience. It enables readers to absorb the details and diction at their own pace, to go back over lines that intrigue or challenge them, and to form an intimate bond with the text. Both interpretations can significantly enhance the understanding and appreciation of the poem, though personal preferences might lean towards the immediacy and auditory elements of the oral reading or the reflective nature of the written words.