104k views
2 votes
What mistake did Lindsay make?

What mistake did Lindsay make?-example-1

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer:

The excluded values are x-values that make the denominator of the original expression zero, since
(a)/(0) is undefined.


x = -3 is not an excluded value since this x-value does not make the denominator zero.


x = -3 makes the numerator zero, but as
(0)/(a)=0 it is not an excluded value.

Therefore, step 3 of her work should read:


\textsf{Finding excluded values}:x\\eq 0\:\textsf{and}\:x\\eq 3

User Flower
by
8.1k points
14 votes

Answer:

Explanation:

Discussion and Correction

The algrebra itself is fine. The exclusions are not so good. The difficulty comes in the denominator. It factors into (2x)(x - 3). x cannot take on a value of 0 (that was pointed out and that is correct). The problem comes in the plus/minus 3. Plus 3 is correct. x - 3 will come 0 if x = 3. Nothing bad will happen if x = - 3

Answer: So the exclusions in the denominator should be modified to x = 3.

User Bitsabhi
by
8.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories