Question

There are two versions to the story of the Alamo. Compare and contrast the two versions. Which version do you agree with? Tell why.

Answer 1

Well, one version makes the Alamo seem of great importance while the other makes it seem as a normal battle that was quick and easy. I agree with both of these because in truth they are both true its just how it was for the Mexicans vs. the Texans.

(This is just if you want a quick and simple answer, I hope this helps have a great day!!)

Answer 2

From the period time of 1800, Mexico has been invited the settlers from America and other parts of the world to Mexico. The land in Mexico was cheap and many acres of land were given to the settlers in Mexico.

Step-by-step explanation:

There was two version story of Alamo comes in the 1960 s and 2004. These stories were a great example of how one battle can be depicted and seen from different angles.

The story of the 1960 s, it shows Alamo defender as the great hero s. They showed a historical epic and very little regard and respect for accuracy. On the other hand, the 2004 story of Alamo showed the humanistic perspective of his defenders, and brutally honest towards Alamo,