Question

4. What do you predict are the dangers of appeasement?

What are the possible benefits?

Answer 1

Appeasement involves dangers like emboldening an aggressor, but can also offer short-term peace and preparation time. It historically refers to Western efforts to avoid war with Nazi Germany before World War II, leading to a delay but ultimately to a larger conflict.

Step-by-step explanation:

The dangers of appeasement typically involve emboldening an aggressor, because they may interpret it as weakness and an opportunity to continue their expansion without consequences. On the flip side, appeasement can provide temporary peace, and allows time for a nation to prepare for the likelihood of future conflicts.

Historically, appeasement is most notably associated with Western democratic governments prior to the start of World War II. It was a policy aimed at avoiding war with aggressive powers such as Nazi Germany, by conceding to some of their demands.

Benefits of appeasement might include the avoidance of immediate conflict, preserving economic interests, and buying time to build up military strength. However, the risks often involve the loss of credibility and moral high ground, failing to deter further aggression, and potentially leading to larger conflicts in the long run, as was the case in the lead-up to World War II.

Answer 2

The policy of appeasement implies lowering the tension in bilateral relations with a country through certain concessions by means of which the country is granted what it wants, in order to rebuild relations and avoid conflicts. A clear example was the appeasement policy carried out by France and Great Britain towards Germany prior to World War II, where they allowed it to acquire certain territories to avoid a future war, something that they could not achieve.

This type of policy has a series of very clear dangers, which are basically granting concessions to the other party that enhance their situation and their power without appeasing the situation of tension, which gives them greater advantages than previously. Furthermore, it can be seen as a sign of weakness.

But, in turn, it can be a positive policy if through these types of tactics it is possible to calm tensions and rebuild bilateral relations.