213k views
1 vote
Question:

According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or
unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?​

User Farinspace
by
4.9k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:unconstitutional

Step-by-step explanation:

User Marses
by
5.1k points
0 votes

Answer:

It was unconstitutional because traditionally, no tribal government or chief held authority over all the Cherokees. But in 1721, South Carolina colonists succeeded in persuading the Cherokees to choose a principal chief for the entire tribe to negotiate selling some of its hunting grounds.

User Broguyman
by
5.0k points