207k views
3 votes
Read these statements:

Speaker 1: A permanent army endangers the liberties of the people.

Speaker 2: The legislature set up by the Constitution doesn't have

enough members.

Speaker 3: The last thing we want is a federal government that is too

strong

Speaker 4: A bill of rights could end up limiting which rights are

protected by the federal government.

Which speaker would most likely be aligned with the Federalists in the fight

over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution?

A. Speaker 3

B. Speaker 2

C. Speaker 1

D. Speaker 4

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer: SPEAKER 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Read these statements: Speaker 1: A permanent army endangers the liberties of the-example-1
User Our
by
4.0k points
2 votes

Answer:

D. Speaker 4

Step-by-step explanation:

The proponents of the new constitution called themselves federalists and opposite to their names they called for a strong central government. Federalists deeply believed in the incapability of the U.S, functioning under supervision of the Articles of Confederation, to enforce protective tariffs had led to an unrestrained flood of manufactured goods, which depressed the economy of the new nation. A bill of rights could eventually restrict the privileges the federal government would have over the power to levy taxes.

User Pupper
by
3.7k points