Final answer:
Uncle Marcos's effect on the household reveals his lack of integrity, authoritative nature, and negative impact on the country.
Step-by-step explanation:
Uncle Marcos's effect on the household reveals several aspects of his character. Firstly, his embezzlement of billions of dollars of public funds and his involvement in fictitious money-laundering corporations demonstrate his lack of integrity and ethical values. This behavior suggests that Uncle Marcos was motivated by personal gain and was willing to exploit his position of power for his own benefit.
Secondly, the fact that Uncle Marcos ruled as a dictator and declared martial law indicates his authoritative nature and a disregard for democratic principles. His decision to impose martial law under the pretext of political conflict and insurgencies suggests that he prioritized maintaining control and suppressing opposition over respecting individual freedoms and human rights.
Lastly, the mass protests and opposition that eventually led to his removal from office highlight the negative impact of Uncle Marcos's leadership on the country. The corruption, vote rigging, and dictatorial actions under his rule created social unrest and ultimately undermined the well-being and progress of the nation.