200k views
4 votes
Explain why China's approach to reform was successful, while the Russian approach to reform failed.

Do you think the Chinese Communist Party can maintain power even though it no longer believes in what it stands for (Communism?)
. Finally, if no one not even the Communist Party still believes in Communism, how does the Chinese Communist Party (the CCP) justify its continued rule of the country?"
as much detail as possible please

User Lzjun
by
6.0k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

it was successful because-look at my explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

The Communist Party in the Soviet Union and the Communist Party in China both had similarities. Among them were immoral leaders as well as effective leaders, a way of keeping their constituents in line, and the end of Communism as the party began with. However, among the few similarities both parties possessed the ultimate demise of Communism in the Soviet Union was their failure to adapt to times. The Soviet Union’s miscalculation of national identity, the lack of a strong connection between Soviet led bloc states, and having a leader that supported Western-Democracy more than Communism were essentially the three paramount factors that led to the disintegration of the Soviet Union and of Communism in it. While Communist China did have an immoral leader, Mao tse-tung, the Communist Party was able to adapt to the times by putting economic reform before political reform. Ultimately this historically brilliant move led by Deng Xiaoping was arguably what kept the Communist Party in rule in China for many years to come, among other things.

THIS IS MY OPINION

User Danjarvis
by
6.0k points