Register
23. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime must be provided with an attorney if he or she was too poor to afford one? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Yates v. United
146k views
0 votes
23. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime

must be provided with an attorney if he or she was too poor to afford one?
a. Gideon v. Wainwright
b. Yates v. United States
C. Miranda v. Arizona
d. Roe v. Wade

User Rosstified
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

a. Gideon v. Wainwright

Step-by-step explanation:

User Simon Bull
by
7.9k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
Link Copied!