Register
23. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime must be provided with an attorney if he or she was too poor to afford one? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Yates v. United
146k views
0 votes
23. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime

must be provided with an attorney if he or she was too poor to afford one?
a. Gideon v. Wainwright
b. Yates v. United States
C. Miranda v. Arizona
d. Roe v. Wade

User Rosstified
by
4.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

a. Gideon v. Wainwright

Step-by-step explanation:

User Simon Bull
by
4.1k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

4.4m questions

5.7m answers

Other Questions

What bird did Benjamin Franklin want as our national bird? which bird was actually chosen?
Which country did the Soviets provide aid to during the Cold War?
What was the quarting act​
The text describes the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. According to the text, the event was designed to do what? A rally support for legislation forbidding discrimination by any defense contractors
Name and explain at least three reasons why the colonies started to become angry at the English Government.
Link Copied!