Final answer:
The evidence provided by the author includes historical context, accounts of violence, psychological resilience, and observations by researchers and project teams. Harrell-Bond's and Voutira's work as well as personal accounts from refugees support the idea that the severe trauma experienced by the Rohingya has impacted their relationships with hope.
Step-by-step explanation:
The evidence provided by the author to support the notion that Rohingya refugees' relationships with hope have been affected by their experiences includes the historical context of the oppression faced by the Rohingya, personal accounts of violence and psychological resilience, and professional observations by researchers and project teams working directly with refugees. Human rights violations, brutal ethnic cleansing campaigns, and sustained periods of living in refugee camps have invariably altered the Rohingya people's relationship with hope and stability.
Harrell-Bond and Voutira highlighted the precarious conditions that refugees often endure, leading to a profound impact on their mental health and self-protective measures. This suggestion of a damaged sense of hope is compounded by the fact that the Rohingya people have lived under a state that sponsored violence against them, including sexual abuse and a systemic denial of citizenship. These long-term, compounded traumas have reshaped the way in which the Rohingya engage with hope; they must constantly manage their psychological well-being amidst uncertainty, as described in the ethnographic studies and psycho-social support initiatives with a relational needs approach.