Final answer:
Sandra may avoid using Bob's Shark Library Web site due to concerns about the source's authorship, potential biases, the absence of peer-reviewed research, lack of publication date, and inadequate citation details that are essential for creating a reliable reference list for her paper.
Step-by-step explanation:
Sandra may choose to avoid using Bob’s Shark Library website as a source for her research paper on the feeding habits of great white sharks for several key reasons related to evaluating sources. Firstly, it is important to assess the credibility of a source by confirming if the author is identified and whether they have professional expertise in the field being discussed. Secondly, the presence of biases or a lack of peer-reviewed research may diminish the reliability of the information provided.
Another aspect of source evaluation is checking for relevant and updated information. If the site lacks information about the date of publication, its content might be outdated. Lastly, for academic writing, it is critical to have proper citation information to reference sources accurately in the research paper. The absence of these details can hinder the process of creating a trustworthy reference list.
Sandra might be looking for sources that back up their claims with data from scientific studies or are peer-reviewed, which tend to offer a higher level of authority and are generally more acceptable for academic research.