4.1k views
5 votes
The Kings own a store in a crime-ridden section of town. As victims of break-ins in the past, they buy a guard dog to protect their store. The dog is trained to attack on command. It also stays in the store from 11 P.M. to 7 A.M. while the store is closed. One night, a man breaks into the store and is attacked by the dog. The man is caught and convicted of burglary. After the judge gives him a suspended sentence, the burglar sues the Kings for the injuries caused by the dog. How would you decide this case?

2 Answers

2 votes
The Kings are in the right and the burglar is in the wrong


The Kings have bought this guard dog for the purpose to guard their store for the break ins and if the burglar had not tried I break into their store he would have not been attacked by the Dog
User Patrikbelis
by
3.4k points
2 votes

Answer:doggo is right, burglar is bad.

the burglar was the one who broke in the first place. the dog was there to defend

User Lebobbi
by
3.7k points