Answer:
Letter A is correct. Its licensing partner, the Oriental Land Company reaped the windfall, because the partner who bore the risk was also likely to be the biggest beneficiary from any upside gain.
Step-by-step explanation:
When analyzing the other Disneylandia around the world, we can see a different case in Tokyo Disneylandia, which is the first in the world that does not belong entirely to Disney. Upon being opened under a license agreement in Tokyo, Disney receives only a royalty fee, and Oriental Land Company receives a substantially favorable profit from the existing value of the Disney brand in the world, and from its stable and well-structured operations model .
So in this license agreement, Disney controls the creative part of the business, and the Oriental Land Company operates the business, which means that there are profitable advantages for both companies.