Answer:
We conclude that the null hypothesis is rejected which means the proportion of men with elevated cholesterol levels is greater than the proportion of women.
Explanation:
We are given that an article in the Archives of Internal Medicine reported that in a sample of 244 men, 73 had elevated total cholesterol levels.
In a sample of 232 women, 44 had elevated cholesterol levels.
Let
= population proportion of men with elevated cholesterol levels.
= population proportion of women with elevated cholesterol levels.
(a) Null Hypothesis,
:
{means that the proportion of men with elevated cholesterol levels is smaller than or equal to the proportion of women}
Alternate Hypothesis,
:
{means that the proportion of men with elevated cholesterol levels is greater than the proportion of women}
The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;
T.S. =
~ N(0,1)
where,
= sample proportion of men with elevated cholesterol levels =
= 0.299
= sample proportion of women with elevated cholesterol levels =
= 0.189
= sample of men = 244
= sample of women = 232
(b) The difference in sample proportions between groups is given by =
= 0.299 - 0.189 = 0.11
(c) So, the test statistics =
= 2.82
The value of z test statistics is 2.82.
Now, the P-value of the test statistics is given by;
P-value = P(Z > 2.82) = 1 - P(Z < 2.82)
= 1 - 0.9976 = 0.0024
(d) If there is difference between the proportions of high cholesterol, then there is a 95% chance that there is a 11% percentage point difference between the high cholesterol rates.
(e) Since, in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%.
As the P-value of the test statistics is less than the level of significance as 0.0024 < 0.05, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.
Therefore, we conclude that the proportion of men with elevated cholesterol levels is greater than the proportion of women.