80.6k views
1 vote
How does reading Frank’s diary differ from reading a secondary source about the Holocaust? What might her diary teach readers today that other sources cannot?

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

Reading Frank’s diary may help us deeply understand the event because she directly witnessed and experienced while a secondary source about the Holocaust may just provide collective information of the event, not the emotions of witnesses. Her diary might teach readers today the attitude when facing a severe problem and not to stop having hope for the good side of the world.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Gene M
by
5.4k points
4 votes

This question refers to Anne Frank's diary, known most often in English as The Diary of a Young Girl.

In this diary, Anne Frank describes the experiences that she faced while she was in hiding with her family during World War II. This allows the reader to learn about the everyday details of the life of a person in this situation, which is not possible to learn from a secondary source. Secondary sources are more likely to give an overview of the general situation, while the diary gives us a specific description of a single life. Moreover, the diary includes details that the secondary source rarely includes, such as descriptions of the emotions that existed in the people suffering through the Holocaust. The diary can teach readers about the ways in which people overcame their problems, and how they were able to find hope and strength despite their suffering. This creates an emotional link with the characters that is rarely developed in secondary sources.

User Neil Foley
by
5.7k points