Question

Rensselaer Water Company contracted with the city of Rensselaer to provide water to the city for use in homes, public buildings, industry, and fire hydrants. During the term of the contract, a building caught fire. The fire spread to a nearby warehouse and destroyed it and its contents. The water company knew of the fire but failed to supply adequate water pressure at the fire hydrant to extinguish the fire. The warehouse owner sued the water company for failure to fulfill its contract with the city. Can the owner of the warehouse enforce the contract?

Answer 1

The warehouse proprietor wouldn't be proficient of imposing the agreement for the subsequent motive. The warehouse proprietor was associate degree related recipient to the agreement.

The agreement was enforced among the waterworks and therefore the city Rensselaer in relevance offer water above all areas of the town. The warehouse proprietor was a simple related recipient, and as a 3rd party within the agreement, could or might/not get pleasure from the contract created.

The warehouse proprietor has no privileges below this explicit agreement: so, he cannot impose a privilege against any party for compensations against associate degree contract within the agreement created among the 2 proposed parties.