Answer:
1-Its huge inefficient bureaucracy, called nomenklatura, which lacked modern means of management (telecommunications, computers, electronic devices, etc.).
2-The inefficient allocation of resources. In companies, managers were subject to close scrutiny by office managers to ensure that they adhered to an excessive list of rules and regulations, which had several unintended consequences. The amount of aid granted to companies in the form of incentive bonuses was determined by the number of workers employed, which led to the hiring of large numbers of unnecessary workers. The production quotas were set in quantitative terms only, which resulted in the production of low-quality items, these strictly quantitative values were an invitation to achieve these quotas through imposture: «Since wages, bonuses and promotions depended on the achievement of the objectives set by the plan, the central planning system it induced, or rather forced to falsify, the results. ”15 Furthermore, many companies sometimes inflated their raw material needs and investment requirements, hoping to have enough to meet or even exceed set quantitative production targets.
3-The soft budgets of which Catherine Verdery speaks were one more means of not guaranteeing the survival of the fittest companies. Any deficit company received funds to overcome the bad moment. And also an inefficient and irrational management such as the hoarding of unnecessary resources, over-employment and unnecessary investments practically never had catastrophic consequences or supposed the disappearance of the affected company, but received even more subsidies to stay afloat. In addition, the reduction of the labor saving factor by an improvement in technology that in a capitalist system reverts to lower prices, could do little to help the "benefits" of directors and planned companies, so they were not for improvements in that type.
4-The basic energy supply of the Soviet Union was going through serious difficulties in the eighties.
5-Steel and oil production stagnated in the period 1980-1984.6
6-Generation plants and transmission lines were outdated and lacked maintenance, as witnessed by frequent breakdowns or blackouts (not to mention the case of Chernobyl).
Step-by-step explanation:
The economic collapse of the Soviet Union was a crisis that that country suffered fines of the 1980s. It consisted of important changes in its economy, which led to its modification as a centralized political unit. This was made official on December 8, 1991 with the Treaty of Belavezha, signed by the presidents of the RSFS of Russia, the RSS of Ukraine and the RSS of Belarus. The former Soviet Union gave rise to several independent countries, which experienced severe contractions of their movements during their transition to capitalism.
After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia, the natural heir to Soviet power, changed into a radically different country. In 1997, its GDP was just over half the levels of 1989. Uzbekistan, where the 1997 GDP was around 80% of 1989 was one of the least close former Soviet republics. Armenia or Georgia were the most affected GDP in 1997 was around 30% in 1989.