Question

On November 7, a painter agreed with a homeowner to paint his house for $10,000, payment to be made upon completion of the job. On November 14, while the job was still incomplete, the painter told her paint supplier that if he would give her the paint she needed, she would have the homeowner pay to him directly the $3,000 for paint that she owed him. The paint supplier agreed, and the painter sent the homeowner a letter setting forth this agreement. On December 1, the painter had completed the job, but the homeowner refused to pay the paint supplier any money

Answer 1

The question relates to a legal issue in contract law, where a homeowner refused to pay a paint supplier per an agreement the painter made with the supplier.

Step-by-step explanation:

The situation outlined involves a contractual agreement where a painter promised to pay a paint supplier $3,000 for supplies out of the $10,000 payment due from a homeowner upon completion of the paint job. Despite the homeowner being notified of this agreement, they refused to pay the supplier upon the painter's completion of the work. This scenario falls into the realm of legal studies, more specifically in the area of contract law and the enforceability of agreements. Under contract law, issues that could be examined include the assignment of rights to the paint supplier and the concept of third-party beneficiaries. To determine the legal obligations and rights of each party, one must consider the details of the agreement between the painter and the homeowner, as well as that between the painter and the supplier.