Question

2.Children (aged 8-14 years) with anxiety disorders were randomly assigned to cognitive behavioral individual treatment, cognitive-behavioral group treatment, or a wait-list control. Treatment outcome was evaluated using diagnostic status, child self-reporting, and parent and teacher-reports. Analyses of diagnostic status revealed that significantly more treated children (73% individual, 50% group) than wait-list children (8%) did not meet diagnostic criteria for their primary anxiety disorder at post-treatment. Other dependent measures demonstrated the superiority of both treatment conditions compared to the wait-list condition. However, a child-report of anxious distress demonstrated only the individual treatment to effect significant improvement. Measures of social functioning failed to discriminate among conditions. Analyses of clinical significance revealed that notable proportions for treated cases were returned to non-deviant limits at post-treatment. Treatment gains were maintained at a 3-month follow-up.

a. Study Design
b. Exposure
c. Outcome

Answer 1

A) Study design can be an investigation/inter-mediation trial/randomized management trial during which youngsters with anxiety complaints are at random assigned to the support treatment.

B) Exposure treatment utilized or exposure assessed is CBT i.e. psychological feature behavior medical aid individually and cluster situations in several arms. Youngsters expecting medical aid act as panels.

C) Outcome are those youngsters who experienced CBT in trial failed to encounter standards for psychological disorder at the top of the education thus it's going to be complete that CBT is operative in administration of youthful anxiety conditions.