Question

In a trial, lawyers may object to a question that is asked of a witness. What are some reasons a

lawyer might object to a specific question? (Select all that apply.)
The question asks about an issue that does not have anything to do with this case.
The question asks about the witness's opinion, not about facts.
The witness already answered the question.
The judge ruled that the lawyers could not discuss that topic in the trial.

Answer 1

Lawyers may object to a specific question in a trial if it is irrelevant, asks for opinions instead of facts, has already been answered, or relates to a topic ruled inadmissible by the judge.

Step-by-step explanation:

Lawyers may object to a specific question in a trial for several reasons:

1. The question asks about an issue that does not have anything to do with this case. Lawyers object to questions that are irrelevant to the current case as they do not provide relevant information that pertains to the matter at hand.
2. The question asks about the witness's opinion, not about facts. Lawyers object to questions that ask for opinions because the witness is expected to testify based on their observations and knowledge of facts, not personal opinions.
3. The witness already answered the question. Lawyers may object to repetitive questions that have already been answered by the witness, as they serve no purpose other than to badger or confuse the witness.
4. The judge ruled that the lawyers could not discuss that topic in the trial. Lawyers are bound by the judge's rulings, and if a topic is deemed inadmissible or irrelevant by the judge, they may object to questions related to that topic.