190k views
4 votes
What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence. They both tried to explain evolution, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence. They both understood how mutations occurred, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence. They both understood how mutations occurred, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence.

User Cadavre
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps :)

User PaolaG
by
8.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories