Question

^ Casey was able to map line segment UV onto line segment ST using a translation and a rotation.

WORTH 15 POINTS PLEASE HELP!!!

Casey concluded:

"I was able to map line segment UV onto line segment ST using a sequence of rigid transformations without a dilation, so the figures are congruent but they are not similar."

What error did casey make in her conclusion?

A. The correct conclusion is that the segments are congruent and similar.
B. The correct conclusion is that the segments are neither congruent, nor similar.
C. There is no error. This is a correct conclusion

Which one is it please?​​

Answer 1

Its a

Explanation:

I got it right on khan academy

Answer 2

A. The correct conclusion is that the segments are congruent and similar.

Explanation:

Congruent figures are also similar because when all sides are equal, they are in the same ratio too (i.e 1 : 1)