21.7k views
1 vote
A good place for reviewers to start is with:

O
A. an analysis of the work's context.
O
B. a quotation from the work's creator.
O
C. their emotional reaction to a work.
O
D. the opinions of other reviewers.

User Ted Nyberg
by
5.2k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

their emotional reaction to a work

Step-by-step explanation:

dont really have an explanation but that the answer that said was right on my

test, hope this helps

User Tashie
by
4.9k points
4 votes

Answer:

A good place for reviewers to start is with:

A. an analysis of the work's context.

Step-by-step explanation:

The work of a reviewer can become really strenuous when the work is too extensive or complex, so an ideal first step is to do a context analysis, that is, not to focus directly on the object of the work but everything that led to its creation, as its historical, social, political or academic base, and all that it would involve, which can give you a general idea of the work, which you will surely use later as prior knowledge to objectively analyze the works without making mistakes like misinterpretations.

User Lifehack
by
4.8k points