Answer:
Yes, since the statute of frauds requires that contracts over $500 must be in writing and signed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statute of frauds requires that certain contracts must be done in writing and they have to be signed by the parties involved.
In this case, the Fuglebergs prepaid the goods and before they were delivered they decided to cancel the oral contract. Since the amount of money involved is very large, much larger than the $500 limit imposed by the statute, the contract should have been written.
In this case, if the Fuglebergs hadn't prepaid the goods, then the contract would have been invalid. Since both parties admitted that a contract existed, but they do not agree on the specific terms. Since Fuglebergs actually performed their part (gave consideration to Triangle), no one can deny it existed. But unless the Fuglebergs have some type of proof that the contract terms that they say were agreed actually are real, then there is no way they can prove their claim.
The most likely outcome is that the goods will be delivered since that is the only thing that both parties admitted as being part of the contract.