146k views
3 votes
Prompt: Write a paragraph in which you argue whether or not Rainsford’s final action in "The Most Dangerous Game” is justified.

Which could serve as claims for a paragraph written in response to the prompt? Check all that apply.

1. Rainsford’s final action in “The Most Dangerous Game” is justified because of
Zaroff’s actions.
2. Rainsford is forced to play what Zaroff calls the “most dangerous game,” to hunt—man.
3. By his own standards, Rainsford is not justified in killing Zaroff in “The Most Dangerous Game.”
4. Rainsford has committed murder, which is not a game.
5. Murder is not something that can be justified

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

Yes,

it is

A. Rainsford’s final action in “The Most Dangerous Game” is justified because of Zaroff’s actions.

C. By his own standards, Rainsford is not justified in killing Zaroff in “The Most Dangerous Game.”

Step-by-step explanation:

User Adam Weitzman
by
4.8k points
4 votes

Answer:

1st one: Rainsford's final action in "The Most Dangerous Game" is justified because of Zaroff's actions.

3rd one: By his own standards, Rainsford is not justified in killing Zaroff in "The Most Dangerous Game."

Step-by-step explanation:

User Rcrogers
by
4.6k points