82.0k views
1 vote
Consider the following Singer inspired argument:________.

(1) Death and suffering are bad.
(2) If we prevent something bad from happening without sacrificing something of comparable moral importance, we should do so.
(3) We can prevent something bad without sacrificing something of moral importance by donating to aid agencies. Therefore, (conclusion), we should donate to aid agencies. Which aspect of this argument does Easterly's critique of humanitarian assistance most directly challenge or undermine?

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

it is good to not sacrifice something important

User JThree
by
3.9k points