Question

Pay attention to how the poem at once seems to describe a pleasant outing and the experience of being called away from life by death. What difference do you observe between these two aspects of the poem? What effect does this difference have on the poem?

Answer 1

In the poem, the speaker is by all accounts talking about a lovely date, as though careless in regards to the way this is an excursion to death. The tone of the sonnet appears to be light and maybe even cavalier of the apparent multitude of scenes cruising by, like these foundations of life were not horribly noteworthy. Notwithstanding, the fundamental state of mind of the sonnet is fairly dismal in light of the fact that the speaker is depicting a world she's abandoning. This contrast between the depictions of the trip and of passing on makes some emotional incongruity. The speaker sees yet doesn't generally observe the universe of the living since she's as of now dead.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

In the poem, the speaker seems to be discussing a pleasant date, as if oblivious to the fact that this is a journey to death. The tone of the poem seems light and perhaps even dismissive of all the scenes passing by, as though these cornerstones of life were not terribly significant. However, the underlying mood of the poem is somewhat sad because the speaker is describing a world she’s leaving behind. This difference between the descriptions of the outing and of dying creates some dramatic irony. The speaker sees but doesn’t really see the world of the living because she’s already dead.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the exact from Edmentum so make sure to change it up a little.