Register
What is the outcome of the following argument? Premise 1: Birds have wings. Premise 2: Helicopters have wings. Conclusion: Helicopters are birds. A) Valid and sound B) Invalid C)Invalid and unsound D)
200k views
1 vote
What is the outcome of the following argument?

Premise 1: Birds have wings.
Premise 2: Helicopters have wings.
Conclusion: Helicopters are birds.

A) Valid and sound
B) Invalid
C)Invalid and unsound
D) Valid and unsound

User Magd Kudama
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

3 votes
I think that the answer is B
User Abhijit Kalamkar
by
7.7k points
5 votes

Answer:

i believe it is b

Step-by-step explanation:

User Blahblah
by
8.3k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

Passe para a voz passiva: - Kevin asked Dennis a question -Somebody Build the house last year -She gives him a box
Who is the author of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland'??
why is mercury usually hard to see without a telescope?
If you are writing a persuasive essay in favor of banning vending machines in schools, which is a counterargument you might anticipate?
In which sentence is a common noun underlined? A. We went horseback riding in Griffith Park yesterday afternoon. B. It was so much fun dancing on the grass in Widley Park. C. We rode all the roller coasters
Link Copied!