67.5k views
0 votes
Plans for a new park call for gardens directly across the sidewalk from each other to be congruent. This computer printout shows a rose garden. If the vertices of a tulip garden are located at (x1,−y1), (x2,−y2), (x3,−y3), and (x4,−y4), will the tulip garden be congruent to the rose garden?

A)No, because the transformation applied was not a rigid motion.
B)You cannot tell because you do not know where the points are on the plane.
C)Yes, because the tulip garden is a reflection of the rose garden.
D)Yes, because the same transformation was applied to all the vertices.

User Omer Raja
by
5.1k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The tulip garden will be congruent to the rose garden as it is a reflection across the x-axis, preserving the size and shape of the original figure.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question involves determining whether two geometric shapes are congruent, specifically two gardens in the shape of polygons. If the vertices of the tulip garden are located at (x1, −y1), (x2, −y2), (x3, −y3), and (x4, −y4) and these represent a transformation applied to the rose garden's vertices, which we can assume to be at (x1, y1), (x2, y2), (x3, y3), and (x4, y4), then the transformation is a reflection across the x-axis. This reflection doesn't change the size or shape of the rose garden; it merely inverts the y-coordinates, thereby keeping the garden's shape and size intact but 'flipping' it symmetrically across the x-axis.

The correct answer to whether the tulip garden will be congruent to the rose garden is C: Yes, because the tulip garden is a reflection of the rose garden. Congruent figures have the same size and shape, but their orientation or position may be different. A reflection is a type of rigid motion, which preserves distances and angles, thus ensuring congruency between the two gardens.

User Michiyo
by
4.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.