Question

Dean, the president of Billing & Credit Company, promises to pay his employee Ewing, who is dangerously obese, $10 for every pound that he loses within the next eleven months. Ewing agrees, diets and exercises, loses 154 pounds, and asks Dean for $1,540. Dean refuses to pay, saying that he does not remember the promise, but that even if he did make it, there was no consideration, and Ewing’s improved health is a sufficient benefit for his effort and sacrifice. Ewing files a suit against Dean. In whose favor is the court likely to rule, and why?

Answer 1

Answer: In Favour of Ewing.

Step-by-step explanation:

When Dean made that promise, he got into a contract with Ewing.

Now for a contract to be enforceable, 4 components must be satisfied. These components are, Agreement, Capacity (mental), Consideration and Legality.

From the above text we can tell that this is therefore a valid contract because both of them agreed to the proposal and were both of sound mind when they did. There was a Consideration ( the benefit in the contract) of $10 per pound and this contract is legally sound so this is a valid contract.

Ewing has fulfilled his side of the bargain and is entitled to his reward or payment.

Dean's claim that Ewing’s improved health is a sufficient benefit for his effort and sacrifice which indeed is a benefit, should not be considered sufficient because it was not agreed upon as a term in the contract.