128k views
2 votes
Determine the decision criterion for rejecting the null hypothesis in the given hypothesis​ test; i.e., describe the values of the test statistic that would result in rejection of the null hypothesis. We wish to compare the means of two populations using paired observations. Suppose that d overbar equals​3.125, subscript dequals​2.911, and nequals​8, and that you wish to test the following hypothesis at the​ 10% level of significance. H0​: mu Subscript d equals 0 against H1​: muSubscript dgreater than0 What decision rule would you​ use?

User Gadoma
by
4.8k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:


t = (3.125-0)/((2.911)/(√(8)))= 3.036

We can use the p value as a decision rule is
p_v<\alpha we reject the null hypothesis.

Now we can find the degrees of freedom given by:


df = n-1=8-1=7

And the p value would be:


p_v = P(t_(7) >3.036) = 0.0094

And since the
p_v <\alpha we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor to the alternative hypothesis.

Explanation:

For this case we have the following statistics for the difference between the paired observations:


\bar d = 3.125 the sample mean for the paired difference


s_d = 2.911 the sample deviation for the paired difference data


n =8 the sample size

The system of hypothesis that we want to check is:

Null hypothesis:
\mu_d =0

Alternative hypothesis:
\mu_d > 0

And the statistic is given by:


t = (\bar d -\mu_d)/((s_d)/(√(n)))

And replacing we got:


t = (3.125-0)/((2.911)/(√(8)))= 3.036

We can use the p value as a decision rule is
p_v<\alpha we reject the null hypothesis.

Now we can find the degrees of freedom given by:


df = n-1=8-1=7

And the p value would be:


p_v = P(t_(7) >3.036) = 0.0094

And since the
p_v <\alpha we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor to the alternative hypothesis.

User Tim Kretschmer
by
4.7k points